Wednesday, May 16, 2012

PALM BEACH POST CONTINUES EFFORTS TO CORRUPT FLORIDA'S ELECTIONS


PALM BEACH POST CONTINUES EFFORTS TO CORRUPT FLORIDA’S ELECTIONS BY SUPPORTING NON-CITIZEN VOTERS RIGHTS
        
Friday, May 11, 2012, the Palm Beach Post ran a report from the Associated Press, written by Gary Fineout of the A.P., entitled “Nearly 200,000 Fla. Voters may not be citizens”. Fineout reports that “a comparison of voter lists and driver’s license information turned up a list of nearly 182,000 people who may not be U.S. citizens”.
        
         The Palm Beach Post has been a leading critic of any attempt to tighten our voter identification and election registration policies in Florida. Governor Rick Scott, the Republican Party and the Independent’s attempt to keep Florida elections fair and corruption-free have been met with numerous editorials and critical reports in the Post. Scott is accused of trying to suppress minority votes. The Florida ACLU, and a Washington-based voting rights group have filed lawsuits against Gov. Scott. Eric Holder and the D.O.J. have expressed opposition.
(Holder continues to condone unlawful voter intimidation by the New Black Panthers but condemns lawful strict voter ID requirements. Is the DOJ setting the stage for a fraudulent election that will provide Democrats with illegal votes while suppressing the opposition?)
        
Florida has about 11 million active voters. The electorate is so closely divided that out of millions of votes, the 2000 election -Gore vs. Bush- was decided by a mere 537 votes! This means that if even a fraction of the 182,000 possible illegal, non-citizen voters cast ballots, the election results could be corrupted, putting illegitimate officials into public office.
         Corrupting the election seems to be the goal of the Democrat Party and their allies in the leftist media. They recognize that most illegals vote Democrat and with abysmal results after 3 ½ years of big government failed policies, their only hope is to steal the election. Once again the progressive media and the DNC demonstrate that the means justifies the end. Doing the unethical and illegal is no obstacle to most Democrats, journalists, editors or publishers as long as the outcome is favorable for the left.
         Nearly a year ago, Dara Kam a Palm Beach Post staff writer, filed a report entitled; “ACLU, voting rights group sue to stop implementation of the new Florida elections law”. She described how critics claim that the new laws make it more difficult for minorities and low-income voters to vote and they typically vote Democrat. So there you have it, progressives want more Democrat voters. Apparently if lax identification and registration laws allow hundreds of illegal non-citizens to corrupt our election by voting for the Democrat; all the better!
         Why can’t the poor vote? There is no fee to register to vote, registration is available at numerous locations- especially in the inner cities- and everyone will have had two years since the 2010 election to accomplish the daunting task of registration. Is Ms. Kam implying that Democrats are typically lazier and dumber than Republicans and Independents; traits that inhibit them from understanding the election process and making registration virtually impossible with out third party, DNC help? Well maybe she has a point!
THE PARTY OF IDIOTS

ASK NOT WHAT YOU CAN DO FOR YOURSELF
VOTE DEMOCRAT

         Even though other states have laws similar to Florida, U.S. Rep. Ted Deutch, D-Boca Raton called for a federal investigation of Florida’s election laws. Deutch claimed that: “Sadly there is a disturbing trend across America making it harder for Americans to exercise their most basic and fundamental right to vote.”
         I say sadly there is a disturbing trend in Washington, D.C., across America, in the media and at the Palm Beach Post to corrupt our elections by not enforcing the election law as required by the United States Constitution; the trend to allow as many non-citizens to vote as possible. Each illegal vote cast and counted (for either party), effectively cancels out an opposing legitimate vote, an American citizen’s vote, thus depriving the American voters of their most basic and fundamental right; their vote.


         Americans send young people to die in war to protect our country from the fanatical, Islamist, extreme terrorists that attacked us on 9/11. I believe any foreigner that serves honorably with us should earn citizenship and a vote. Those who continue their evil efforts both abroad and at home, who at this very minute scheme to deny us our freedoms and God given rights and attempt to defile our elections must be defeated on the field of battle and at the election box. We civilians must fight at home to preserve the integrity of our most basic right; the right to vote and to have that vote matter, not be canceled out by illegal participants.

QUESTION MEDIA BIAS

VOTE OUT THE DEMOCRATS

         Don’t allow the Democrat Party or their minions at the Palm Beach Post to corrupt Florida’s elections through fraud, intimidation or illegal participation!

That’s why the Palm Beach Post Sucks!

Thomas Fuller: “Take Heed: Most men will cheat without Scruple where they can do it without Fear!”

Thursday, May 10, 2012

PALM BEACH POST KICKS OFF ITS 2012 PRO-DEMOCRAT, PRO-COMMUNIST ELECTION CAMPAIGN


PALM BEACH POST KICKS OFF ITS 2012 PRO-DEMOCRAT, PRO-COMMUNISM PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGN
JOURNALIST FAWNING OVER COMMUNIST DICTATOR

Florida is considered a major swing state in the upcoming presidential election. The Palm Beach Post will use all of its resources and power to get Obama and Democrat Party politicians elected to office.
         The minions for Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and the Democrat Party, disguised as journalist at the Palm Beach Post, have begun their 2012 election campaign onslaught against conservatives; Republicans, Independents and Tea Partiers.
Gov. Rick Scott’s dismal but rising approval ratings apparently didn’t go unnoticed by the editors of the Palm Beach Post as they scrambled to denigrate Scott. Two front-page reports and all three editorials in Sunday’s paper were hit pieces on the Governor.
         On the front page, Laura Green –Washington Bureau minion for the Post- submitted a report entitled “States’ rebellion in DNA of nation”. She quotes governor of Florida, Rick Scott, as saying; “I don’t believe it (Obamacare) will ever be the law of the land”. She follows Scott’s quote with the following comment; “The incendiary language, the split-off of 26 states legally challenging the law, and the outright rebellion of some top state officials have drawn parallels to the Civil War”. So according to Ms. Green, if one disagrees with Obama and believes Obamacare will not become federal law, one is using incendiary language and creating the conditions for a new civil war.
         Also on page one, a report by John Kennedy –Capital Bureau minion for the Post- entitled “Scott ad blitz not swaying Floridians”. Mr. Kennedy reports that “Scott’s weak polling bolsters Obama supporter’s hopes”. Oddly, Kennedy then reports that Scott’s poor approval ratings have risen and among Republicans is 72% positive. In another random act of professional journalism, Kennedy accurately reports that under Scott Florida’s unemployment rate has fallen to a three-year low; due to the Republican governors pro-business initiatives. Scott is also given credit for his $1 billion investment in Florida schools. The following is a poll done by Associated Industries of Florida showing the popularity of Scott’s policies:
“Poll results show people like Rick Scott's policies, but not Rick Scott
According to poll results released Monday by Associated Industries of Florida, three out of every four Floridians support Gov. Rick Scott’s position on such policies as as property tax relief, public employee pension reform, drug testing for welfare applicants and the elimination of teacher tenure.
The Governor also scored a job approval rating of 45 percent. But overall, only 37 percent of those polled have a favorable opinion of the governor.
On property taxes, 79 percent of those polled favored passage of $200 million in property tax relief and tax cuts for small businesses pushed by Scott. Support spans across political affiliations with 85 percent of Republicans, 80 percent of Independents, 74 percent of Democrats and 72 percent of Ticket-splitters in favor of property tax relief. 
On pension reform, 76 percent of respondents supported a new law requiring state workers to contribute to their own retirement accounts.”
(WOW! What a concept!)
“Asked about drug testing people applying for welfare, 74 percent of respondents were in favor, including 58 percent who strongly favored this policy.
Poll results also indicate that 73 percent of Floridians favor ending the practice of granting teachers tenure.”

Despite Kennedy’s claim of weak overall approval among Floridians, Scott’s approval in the polls is on the rise. Those editorial writers of the Palm Beach Post will not stand idly by while a Republican receives credit for his success. Sunday, Randy Schultz headed a multipronged attack with anti-Scott editorials.
        
        
         First, Democrat mouthpiece and P.B.P. minion Andrew Marra wrote on the editorial page under OUR VIEWS, his piece entitled “Scott railroaded the state”. At issue is Gov. Scotts’ issuing of an executive order permitting random drug testing of all state workers. Judge Ursula Ungaro ruled that there was no evidence of a drug use problem at the covered agencies and thus testing was an unwarranted intrusion on individual’s fourth amendment interests.
         Polls have shown that 74% of Floridians agree with drug testing fellow citizens who ask for their hard earned tax dollars. Nationwide, countless employers require random drug testing of employees. If workers don’t like it they are free to leave, just as a government employee is free to resign; there is no forced testing. Why would Judge Ungaro find this testing constitutional for some (private sector) but not for others (public sector)? Either it’s Ok for every citizen or taboo for all. Laws should be applied equally to law-abiding citizens who have not lost their rights.
Government workers are employed by the private citizens of the country and are paid to serve them. Government workers cannot be deemed superior or given more constitutional protections under our law than the people they serve. Once again, why should those public service employees, who work for and serve the citizens of the private sector, have more rights and protections than the workers who pay their salaries?
Marra reports that drug tests have been upheld for train operators Customs agents and even public school students! This selective application of law is what divides Americans and flawed legal interpretations by activist judges undermine the constitutional protections of all Americans.
Marra also mentions how Florida’s law to drug test welfare recipients seems doomed. Once again, many American workers must submit to random drug testing. Then their tax money is confiscated by the government and given to welfare recipients who Marra believes should not be required to drug test!  Mr. Marra says, “These needless tests trample Floridians’ constitutional rights… If this is true what about the guy who works at Home Depot, does he have fewer rights than a welfare queen or a county code inspector? Any of these citizens have the ability to refuse the welfare payments or quite the government or private job if they don’t want to test; no one is being forced to test!
After Marra’s attack on Scott and his policies, Randy Schultz, minion in chief for D.N.C. Chair, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, unloaded a double barrel hit job on the Republicans, the NRA and Gov. Scott. His first attack is entitled “A double-barreled standard”. In regard to Florida’s stand your ground law, Schultz asks, “Why do self-defense defendants deserve special protection?”  
I ask Schultz; Why should any crime victim, who protects their very life, be prosecuted for the act of self defense when after an investigation it is determined that the victim acted in self defense? Why should a law abiding citizen protecting her life become a defendant?” Self-defense is not a special protection, it is a protection guaranteed to every law abiding citizen, their right to life and liberty, against the criminal who would do them harm.

Shultz unloaded the second barrel directly on Gov. Scott. The editorial is entitled; “Still firing away wildly at Cuba and hitting Florida.” The piece is critical of Gov. Scott for not normalizing relations and trade with Communist Cuba and for signing House Bill 959. Speaking of the bill, Schultz says; “It is a sop to Cuban exiles and their patrons who have frozen U.S. policy toward the island for 53 years.”
Apparently Mr. Randy Schultz is either a proponent of communist dictators, oppression and atrocities or simply and ignorant man. Based on the history of his leftist writing, I believe the former is quite likely.
The following is a link to Wikipedia that describes extensively the horrors that communism perpetrates on its people.  


The following is from Wikipedia:
“Torture of prisoners
Day and night, the screams of tormented women in panic and desperation who cry for God's mercy fall upon the deaf ears of prison authorities. They are confined to narrow cells with no sunlight called "drawers" that have cement beds, a hole on the ground for their bodily needs, and are infested with a multitude of rodents, roaches, and other insects.... In these "drawers" the women remain weeks and months. When they scream in terror due to the darkness (blackouts are common) and the heat, they are injected sedatives that keep them half-drugged.
                    Juan Carlos González Leiva, State Security Prison. Holguín, Cuba, October 2003.[54

Political oppression
Further information: Cuban dissidents
A 2009 report by Human Rights Watch concluded that "Raúl Castro has kept Cuba’s repressive machinery firmly in place...since being handed power by his brother Fidel Castro."[25] The report found that "[s]cores of political prisoners arrested under Fidel continue to languish in prison, and Raúl has used draconian laws and sham trials to incarcerate scores more who have dared to exercise their fundamental rights.

Political abuse of psychiatry
Although Cuba has been politically connected to the Soviet Union since the United States broke off relations with Cuba shortly after the president Fidel Castro came to power in 1959, few considerable allegations regarding the political abuse of psychiatry in this country emerged before the late 1980s.[24]:74 Americas Watch and Amnesty International published reports alluding to cases of possible unwarranted hospitalization and ill-treatment of political prisoners.[24]:75

Forced labor camps and abuse of prisoners
In 1986 a "Tribunal on Cuba" was held in Paris to present testimonies by former prisoners of Cuba's penal system to the international media. The gathering was sponsored by Resistance international and The Coalition of Committees for the Rights of Man in Cuba. The testimonies presented at the tribunal, before an international panel, alleged a pattern of torture in Cuba's prisons and "hard labor camps". These included beatings, biological experiments in diet restrictions, violent interrogations and extremely unsanitary conditions. The jury concurred with allegations of arbitrary arrests; sentencing by court martial with neither public audience nor defense; periods in hard labour camps without sufficient food, clothes and medical care; and the arrests of children over nine years old.[23]

Political executions
Latin American historian Thomas E. Skidmore says there had been 550 executions in the first six months of 1959.[20] British historian Hugh Thomas, in his study Cuba or the pursuit of freedom[21] stated that "perhaps" 5,000 executions had taken place by 1970,[20] while The World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators ascertained that there had been 2,113 political executions between the years of 1958-67.[20]
Society
Permission from the government is required to move to another home due to the lack of private property rights. Jobs are also subject to state control, often people's occupations are handpicked by Raul Castro himself via postal mail. Jobs are based on school grades and general reputation of the person.”

         Is it any wonder why a Cuban’s still set themself adrift on an inflated inner tube in shark infested open, ocean to escape the horrors of communism?
         Apparently Randy Schultz has never seen the reports of boats loaded with desperate destitute young Cubans drifting ashore in his home state.
The propagandist, Schultz, describes the Cuban exile community as; “The exiles, Cuba’s monied class, resettled, learned the language and moved back up from working-class jobs.”
If Schultz was referring to the original first wave of refugees, 56 years ago, most would no longer be alive today. Even a successful 30yr old arriving in 1959 would now be 83yrs old! And over the following 53yr period, why would so many living in the utopian, nirvana, of communist Cuba die at sea tying to escape? 
         Is Schultz an over privileged moron? Has he never traveled to Little Havana or Miami? I fail to see so many 1%’ers in the streets there!
Maybe it’s the fact that many Cuban’s worked their way back up that raises Schultz’s ire. Don’t’ they know about welfare and the big nanny state?
As usual Randy Schultz and the Palm Beach Post are wrong. The exiles weren’t only the 1%’ers of Batista’s regime. Over 10% of the entire population of Cuba fled the country and the other 90% are held prisoner. Even many of the Cuban Communist elites have defected from the hell of Castro’s regime.
  

The following link is from Florida International University describing more of Dictator Fidel Castro and the Communist Cuban government regime’s worldwide atrocities and attacks on humanity.


If you think that Cuba has reformed, you’re wrong again. Just two months ago I met middle aged Cuban man in a class I took. He escaped Castor’s Hench men just a couple of years ago. He is writing a book about his 7 years of torture in a Cuban prison and then 3 years in a hard labor camp. His crime was having written negative opinions of the Cuban government. He was a small man who looked 20 years older than his age of 40’ish. He walked with a limp and his joints and bones were ruined. He said he almost died and was released only because of his poor health. Suffering from malnutrition and a number of illnesses, he was nursed to back to health in Miami. When he spoke of his treatment by the communists, rage welled up in his face and eyes and his body trembled.
This is not the refugee that I met, but is a representation of his treatment.

He claims that after making it to America and regaining reasonable health, he started his book project. People that he believes are communists, living in Miami, Florida ransacked and burned his office and all his research materials. He was forced to start from scratch but now his manuscript is complete and he is going to publish it. It was quite an experience to meet a victim of communism and Fidel Castro.

         I would love to be able to visit the beautiful Island of Cuba. But I would never think of it until the communists are vanquished. If I were to lie on a beautiful Cuban beach knowing that native Cubans are banned from enjoying it, or to know that Cuban people not far away are dying in dungeons as I enjoyed their land; I would not be able to look at myself in a mirror.
Apparently, Randy Schultz has no problem with ruthless dictators who oppress and torture political opponents as long as they are of the communist variety. The Democrat’s Congressional Progressive Caucus agrees with Schultz; many members have visited Castro and returned with glowing praise for the regime.

         Schultz says; “Further, and more important, the bill could punish Florida more than it would punish Cuba.”
Mr. Schultz doesn’t have a concept of punishment as described by Cuban refugees. Schultz is an elitist. A man living in a progressive bubble of entitlement who attacks many things that freedom and liberty provide to the American people.
My Cuban, political prisoner acquaintance has first hand knowledge of the type of propaganda Randy Schultz practices. He told me he cannot believe the complacency of Americans and how much they have to lose by drifting down the path of socialism to the final destination, communisms. He told me he couldn’t understand the naivety of the leftist media- newspapers and TV-, which he believes are in danger of losing freedom of speech.
Apparently the poor man has not figured out that most of the media-just like the Democrat Party- are part of the progressive movement, FORWARD, toward socialism and communism.   

That’s Why The Palm Beach Post Sucks!
FORWARD!

Mao Tse-Tung:        “Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy.”

Friday, May 4, 2012

YODA SAYS EAT DOG NOT PIG


PALM BEACH COUNTY TO CONSIDER ALLOWING MORE PORK IN THE COMMUNITY
Fun Friday Pig Out
On Friday, April 27th 2012, a report by Jennifer Sorentrue, a staff writer for the Palm Beach Post, said that the Palm Beach County Commission was considering allowing potbellied pigs to be kept as pets. She wrote;
The request came at the urging of suburban Delray Beach resident Jennifer San Filippo, who feared she might lose her 80-pound pig, Yoda, after someone complained to the county’s code enforcement office”.
         Several commissioners questioned the proposed rule change. Commissioner Karen Marcus was concerned that residents might be less likely to adopt dogs and cats from the overcrowded county animal shelters if pigs are allowed as pets.
The editors of “Why The Palm Beach Post Sucks” sent a crack team to investigate the pig dilemma. Our team was lead by animal psychic and pig psychologist, Dr. Gordo Grunter, who went to Delray to interview Yoda the pig by means of telepathic communication.

Animal Psychic, Dr. Gordo Grunter: “Yoda, how do you feel about being kept as a pet pig instead of becoming bacon?”

Yoda: “Smarter than dogs, we are. Tastier than pigs, dogs are by far.”

Gordo: “Are you saying that America should follow president Obama’s lead and eat dogs? Are you saying that we should keep pigs as pets and eat our dogs?”



Yoda: “Eat dogs you must!”

Gordo: “You might have a point, Obama said Pit Bulls are delicious and the county has an abundance of homeless pets, we should eat them. Moreover,  in November of 2011, Obama signed a law to allow the slaughter of horses for human consumption by Americans, that might solve the problem of abandoned horses.

Yoda: “Eating pork, Islam says don’t, eating horse a hungry Muslim might.”


A HORSE LOVERS FAVORITE: HORSE HEAD SOUP

Gordo: “Is this “man eat dog campaign” just a ploy by pigs world wide, a vast sus scrofa, swine conspiracy to keep people from eating pigs?”

Yoda: “Sharia Law, we support, no pork sausage; try some boiled mutt.”

Gordo: “Maybe you are on to something! With a good add campaign and the support of Barrack and Michelle, dogs might become an acceptable healthy food source, especially in the public school cafeteria’s.”


Yoda: “Tasty dogs are, better than pigs by far.”

Gordo: “If dogs are good enough for the president of the United States, I guess they are good enough for people worldwide! I’ll report your point of view to my boss. Thanks for your time, Mr. Yoda.”

Yoda: “May the horse be with you, and some canine pie.

After evaluating the findings of our investigative reporters and Dr. Gordo Grunter, and after careful consideration, the editorial board of “THE PALM BEACH POST SUCKS” recommends that the county commissioners allow potbellied pigs as pets and to allow county residents and restaurants to serve dog and horse meat as a substitute for pork.  All animal shelters should be encouraged to sell live dogs in order to supply the community with fresh dog meat. This proposal will solve the problem of overcrowded animal shelters and provide Palm Beach residents with healthy delicious meals at a low cost.
OBAMA SUPPORTER SHOPPING AT THE D.C. ANIMAL SHELTER

SPECIAL OF THE DAY; LIVE WHOLE, PUG $6.99 Lb.


WANT MORE DELICIOUS DOG RECIPES? CLICK THE FOLLOWING LINK:



Art Buchwald: “This is not an easy time for humorists because the government is far funnier than we are.”

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Allen West is Correct, CPC promotes Communism


PALM BEACH POST’S ANTI ALLEN WEST PROPAGANDA RUINS TOURISTS VACATION!


         On Sunday April 27th, 2012, the Palm Beach Post published a letter to the editor from H.L. Brand who is a resident of Montana and recently visited the West Palm Beach area. Brand read the Palm Beach Post on a daily basis during his visit. The following is his opinion of the Palm Beach Post:
 “Your criticism of U.S. Representative Allen West’s comments about communists in Congress represented journalism at it’s worst.”
Apparently Mr. Brand concluded what many intelligent people in Palm Beach County have long known. After reading numerous editions, Brand found the reporting of The Palm Beach Post to be consistently distorted and biased. He also wrote:
The knee-jerk reaction to Rep. West’s statement as demonstrated in your paper reveals much about the media, your state and liberalism’s blinders.”
            Brand was referring to the controversy surrounding Allen West’s statement that up to 81 Congressional Democrat members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus are communists.
Brand asked the readers and the journalists of the Post to do a Google search of The American Socialist Party, the American Communist Party and The Congressional Progressive Caucus to discover the common thread and similarity of these groups’ ideology. 
I took Mr. Brands advice. I was amazed to find that these groups not only have a common thread but also have nearly identical goals and ideology!

See this from keywiki.org:
The Congressional Progressive Caucus was founded in 1991 by Bernie Sanders-the openly socialist then Congressman from Vermont, Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and the radical Washington DC based "think tank" Institute for Policy Studies (IPS).
Many members were and continue to be linked to DSA and/or the Communist Party USA, IPS or other radical organizations.
From small beginnings the CPC has grown to embrace more than 80 members of Congress and three in the Senate - Roland BurrisBernie Sanders and Tom Udall (NM).
Communist Party on the Congressional Progressive Caucus
A 2002 report by Joelle Fishman, Chair, Political Action Committee, Communist Party USA to the Party's National Board, evaluated the Congressional Progressive Caucus[22].
Although this Caucus is not large enough to control the Congressional agenda or even to break into the media, the existence of this group of 57 members of Congress, which includes 20 members of the Congressional Black Caucus and six members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, provides an important lever that can be used to advance workers' issues and move the debate to the left in every Congressional District in the country.”
That was the Congressional Progressive Caucus.Compare that to the following description of the Communist Party.
The CPUSA Bill of Rights socialism
“The Communist Party USA emphasizes a vision of socialism as an extension of American democracy. Seeking to "build socialism in the United States based on the revolutionary traditions and struggles" of American history, the CPUSA promotes a conception of "Bill of Rights Socialism" that will "guarantee all the freedoms we have won over centuries of struggle, and also extend the Bill of Rights to include freedom from unemployment"– as well as freedom "from poverty, from illiteracy, and from discrimination and oppression."[52]
Reiterating the idea of property rights in socialist society as it is outlined in Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto,[53] the Communist Party emphasizes that
"Many myths have been propagated about socialism. Contrary to right-wing claims, socialism would not take away the personal private property of workers", but "the private ownership of major industries, financial institutions, and other large corporations, and the excessive luxuries of the super-rich."[52]
Rather than making all wages entirely equal, the Communist Party USA holds that building socialism would entail "eliminating private wealth from stock speculation, from private ownership of large corporations, from the export of capital and jobs, and from the exploitation of large numbers of workers."[52]”

The CPUSA constitution and program
According to its 2001 Constitution, the party operates on the principle of democratic centralism, its highest authority being the quadrennial National Convention. Article VI, Section 3 of the 2001 Constitution lays out certain positions as non-negotiable:”
That was the Communist Party USA. 
The goals of the Communist Party USA and the Congressional Progressive Caucus are nearly identical. They envision a huge centralized government that provides equality of outcome not of opportunity. Both propose a cradle to grave nanny state that will choose the winners and losers at the cost of personal freedom and a system of wealth confiscation and redistribution. Both are clearly anti-constitutional and anti-American organizations.
 Need more evidence? The following is from Wikipedia:
The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) is the largest caucus within the Democratic caucus in the United States Congress with 76 declared members, and works to advance progressive issues and positions.[1]
The CPC was founded in 1991 and now has 76 members. The Caucus is co-chaired by Representatives Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ) and Keith Ellison (D-MN). Of the 20 standing committees of the House in the 111th Congress, 10 were chaired by members of the CPC. Those chairmen were replaced when the Republicans took control of the House in the 112th Congress The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) is the largest caucus within the Democratic caucus in the United States Congress with 76 declared members, and works to advance progressive issues and positions.[1] In addition, an array of national liberal organizations work to support the efforts of the progressive caucus, including the Institute for Policy Studies, The Nation magazine, MoveOn.org, National Priorities Project, Jobs with Justice, Peace Action, Americans for Democratic Action, and Progressive Democrats of America. Also co-sponsoring the kickoff event were the NAACP, ACLU, Progressive Majority, League of United Latin American Citizens, Rainbow/PUSH Coalition, National Council of La Raza, Hip Hop Caucus, Human Rights Campaign, Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs, and the National Hip Hop Political Convention.”
Research the ideology of the CPC's allies, the liberal organizations listed above.
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, squawks like a duck but calls itself a swan, it’s still a duck!

The CPC and their Democrat media allies can portray the organization as they please, but, as usual, they cannot hide the truth from informed citizens.
 Even though Allen West’s accusation that progressive Democrats are socialists- if not outright communists- is valid, the left will lynch him in the media. Allen West is a runaway. He is off the liberal plantation and as a successful minority and a conservative black, he must be silenced.
Soledad O’Brien took on the task of character assassination for CNN. See the following link:

This is from the CNN interview:
 O'Brien then started reading the name of some of the CPC's members and asked incredulously if these people were Communists.
"You can call it whatever you want," answered West. "I'm talking about their beliefs. I'm calling it this: Communist, Progressive, Marxist, Socialist, Statist - which is another term that's been used - I'm looking at the ideologies, I'm looking at the things that they believe in, and if you don't think that we have to stand upon truth and be able to identify and clearly contrast the different principles and values and ideologies and principles of governance here in this country, then we're never going to get to the fact of accepting the true debate that's happening in America."
"We don't need a bureaucratic nanny state. We need to stay a Constitutional Republic. I think a lot of people need to study that and understand what it is. Can anybody argue with that?”

Palm Beach County is a Democrat stronghold for corrupt socialist politicians who are in bed with the liberal mainstream media. Allen West is a conservative black, thus off the liberal plantation and will be lynched in the pages of the Post and by the Palm Beach Democrat Party. This area is infested with successful, well-educated liberals, transplanted from the Northeast and other pockets of corruption like Chicago; where the Union/ Democrat political machine makes Karl Marx look like a capitalist. The limousine liberal hypocrites of Palm Beach County come from the same mold as Warren Buffet, a man who whines publicly that he is not taxed enough while conducting a protracted fight with the Treasury Department to avoid paying over ONE BILLION DOLLARS in delinquent taxes! See this link:

   How can any fair-minded person identify with the hypocritical and corrupt Democrat Party?


The new Obama Administration one word campaign slogan has been announced. It is FORWARD! 
See what the Washington Times reports:
Many Communist and radical publications and entities throughout the 19th and 20th centuries had the name "Forward!" or its foreign cognates. Wikipedia has an entire section called "Forward (generic name of socialist publications)."
"The Obama campaign apparently didn't look backwards into history when selecting its new campaign slogan, "Forward" — a word with a long and rich association with European Marxism.

Back to Allen West's comment. Do you expect the NAACP to come to the defense of Allen West and his right to free speech? Don’t hold your breath. The NAACP proved once again that they are an organization for the advancement of only liberal colored people. They have sent the plantation house bosses after the runaway, Allen West. See what Scripps reports;
"Rep. Allen West (R-Fla.) was supposed to be the keynote speaker at a fundraiser for his district chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) this past Saturday. But days before the event, the group canceled the gathering and asked West not to come back when they rescheduled. Why?" Click the following link to tcpalm.com:
"There's a certain statement he made about Communists," Jerry Gore, president of the Martin County NAACP, told Scripps Treasure Coast Newspapers. "That statement alone ... we do not represent that type of atmosphere."

The NAACP and Jerry Gore believe in communist style censorship and the monolithic politically correct ideology of the left. Diversity of opinion is anathema to the Democrats and the CPC. Here is list of the intolerant communistic members of our government:

House members
All members are members of the Democratic Party or caucus with the Democratic Party. There are currently 76 declared Progressives, including 73 voting Representatives, two non-voting Delegates, and one Senator.
[edit]
                Ed Pastor (AZ-4, Phoenix)
                Raúl Grijalva (AZ-7, Tucson) - Co-Chair
[edit]
                Lynn Woolsey (CA-6, Santa Rosa)
                George Miller (CA-7, Richmond)
                Barbara Lee (CA-9, Oakland)
                Pete Stark (CA-13, Fremont)
                Janice Hahn (CA-36, San Pedro)
                Michael Honda (CA-15, San Jose)
                Sam Farr (CA-17, Monterey)
                Xavier Becerra (CA-31, Los Angeles)
                Judy Chu (CA-32, El Monte)
                Karen Bass (CA-33, Baldwin Hills)
                Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-34, Los Angeles)
                Maxine Waters (CA-35, Inglewood)
                Laura Richardson (CA-37, Long Beach)
                Linda Sánchez (CA-39, Lakewood)
                Bob Filner (CA-51, San Diego)
[edit]
                Jared Polis (CO-02, Boulder)
[edit]
                Rosa DeLauro (CT-3, New Haven)
[edit]
                Corrine Brown (FL-3, Jacksonville)
                Frederica Wilson (FL-17, Miami)
[edit]
                Hank Johnson (GA-4, Lithonia)
                John Lewis (GA-5, Atlanta)
[edit]
                Mazie Hirono (HI-2, Honolulu)
[edit]
                Bobby Rush (IL-1, Chicago)
                Jesse Jackson, Jr. (IL-2, Chicago Heights)
                Luis Gutierrez (IL-4, Chicago)
                Danny Davis (IL-7, Chicago)
                Jan Schakowsky (IL-9, Chicago)
[edit]
                André Carson (IN-7, Indianapolis)
[edit]
                Dave Loebsack (IA-2, Cedar Rapids)
[edit]
                Chellie Pingree (ME-1, North Haven)
[edit]
                Donna Edwards (MD-4, Fort Washington)
                Elijah Cummings (MD-7, Baltimore)
[edit]
                John Olver (MA-1, Amherst)
                Jim McGovern (MA-3, Worcester)
                Barney Frank (MA-4, Newton)
                John Tierney (MA-6, Salem)
                Ed Markey (MA-7, Malden)
                Mike Capuano (MA-8, Boston)
[edit]
                John Conyers (MI-14, Detroit)
[edit]
                Keith Ellison (MN-5, Minneapolis) - Co-Chair
[edit]
                Bennie Thompson (MS-2, Bolton)
[edit]
                William Lacy Clay, Jr. (MO-1, St. Louis)
                Emanuel Cleaver (MO-5, Kansas City) - Chairman, Congressional Black Caucus
[edit]
                Frank Pallone (NJ-06, Long Branch)
                Rush Holt (NJ-12, Hopewell Township)
[edit]
                Ben R. Luján (NM-3, Santa Fe)
[edit]
                Jerry Nadler (NY-8, Manhattan)
                Yvette Clarke (NY-11, Brooklyn)
                Nydia Velázquez (NY-12, Brooklyn)
                Carolyn Maloney (NY-14, Manhattan)
                Charles Rangel (NY-15, Harlem)
                José Serrano (NY-16, Bronx)
                Maurice Hinchey (NY-22, Saugerties)
                Louise Slaughter (NY-28, Rochester)
[edit]
                Mel Watt (NC-12, Charlotte)
[edit]
                Marcy Kaptur (OH-9, Toledo)
                Dennis Kucinich (OH-10, Cleveland)
                Marcia Fudge (OH-11, Warrensville Heights)
[edit]
                Earl Blumenauer (OR-3, Portland)
                Peter DeFazio (OR-4, Eugene)
[edit]
                Bob Brady (PA-1, Philadelphia)
                Chaka Fattah (PA-2, Philadelphia)
[edit]
                David Cicilline (RI-1, Providence)
[edit]
                Steve Cohen (TN-9, Memphis)
[edit]
                Sheila Jackson Lee (TX-18, Houston)
                Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30, Dallas)
[edit]
                Peter Welch (VT-At Large)
[edit]
                Jim Moran (VA-8, Alexandria)
[edit]
                Jim McDermott (WA-7, Seattle)
[edit]
                Tammy Baldwin (WI-2, Madison)
                Gwen Moore (WI-4, Milwaukee)
[edit]
Non-voting
                Donna M. Christensen (Virgin Islands)
                Eleanor Holmes Norton (District of Columbia)
[edit]
Senate members
Bernie Sanders (Vermont)

Here is how Wikipedia describes Bernie Sanders:
“Sanders is a self-described democratic socialist,[1][2] and has praised European social democracy (though he has also criticized its contemporary "Third Way" departure). He is the first person elected to the U.S. Senate to identify as a socialist.[3] Sanders caucuses with the Democratic Party and is counted as a Democrat for the purposes of committee assignments, but because he does not belong to a formal political party, he appears as an independent on the ballot.”


At least Sanders is open and honest. He admits that he is a socialist. The other 75 members of the CPC agree with Sanders ideology and can call themselves what they please, but they are ideologically socialist if not communist. The old communist USSR called it self the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic, but they too were communists.

Allen West has been accused of being the new McCarthy on a witch-hunt for communists. After a bit of research I have discovered the following information from Wikipedia: 

“Other authors and historians, including Arthur Herman,[114] assert that new evidence—in the form of Venona decrypted Soviet messages, Soviet espionage data now opened to the West, and newly released transcripts of closed hearings before McCarthy's subcommittee—has partially vindicated McCarthy by showing that many of his identifications of Communists were correct and that the scale of Soviet espionage activity in the United States during the 1940s and 1950s was larger than many scholars suspected.[115][116]
After reviewing evidence from Venona and other sources, historian John Earl Haynes concluded that, of 159 people identified on lists used or referenced by McCarthy, evidence was substantial that nine had aided Soviet espionage efforts. He suggested that a majority of those on the lists could legitimately have been considered security risks, but that a substantial minority could not.[117]”

In the McCarthy era, nine members of Congress have now been proven to be spies for the Communists. How many others went undetected? Why is it so far fetched that current members of congress do oppose our Constitution and desire a communistic form of government?
Because of their own statements, it’s obvious to me that many Democrats are pro-communist and anti-capitalists.
Google the comments of admiration for Fidel Castro and Mao made by members of the Obama Administration and Democrat Congressional members, the evidence is clear and irrefutable. The Democrat Party is chalk full of socialists and communists.

Consider yourself fortunate Mr. Brand, you can enjoy professional journalism as practiced in Montana and other open-minded regions of America. We residents of South Florida have no conservative option to the Palm Beach Post, a paper known to many south Floridians as The Palm Beach Pravda.
Thank you H.L. Brand for suggesting that we brainwashed Palm Beach residents do our own research to expose the bias and distortions of the pathetic excuse of a newspaper, The Palm Beach Post.

That’s Why The Palm Beach Post Sucks!

Irvine Berlin: “The world would not be in such a snarl. If Marx had been Groucho instead of Karl.”